This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/4 v1] Add xmethod documentation and NEWS entry
- From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 10:10:04 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v1] Add xmethod documentation and NEWS entry
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGyQ6gz2g6UMBNcZprDcMhG-Ts4Fd3jy6Hu3HhQ7jA3CMQTCOA at mail dot gmail dot com> <83ha439l4m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAGyQ6gyw=8WRin3VFZkZdmYWQ=1MBGmdcmJenh595cGnHj7RpQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <83egz6a3ab dot fsf at gnu dot org>
Thanks. Committed.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:43:52 -0700
>> From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12 -0700
>> >> From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
>> >>
>> >> The attached patch is almost the same as v19 except that it adds a
>> >> small note about the xmethod example mentioning that xmethod in the
>> >> example is slightly a different version of C++ operator+.
>> >
>> > Could you please identify the addition explicitly? I'm not sure which
>> > note did you have in mind.
>>
>> Sorry for not being explicit. The part I am referring to is in the
>> node "Writing an Xmethod". It is in the "@noindent" piece right after
>> the first C++ example listing.
>
> OK, that's fine. Thanks.