This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 7.7 branching on Monday?
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, GDB <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:29:43 -0800
- Subject: Re: GDB 7.7 branching on Monday?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20131219175908 dot GH3493 at adacore dot com> <CAMe9rOp0M_8WAMyviNJ4X_xr7tA1GKGCQ-7yaQ=5Z5xdxGZ5TQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <201312192151 dot rBJLpr1i015135 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:06:36 -0800
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I think the last known issue on the TODO list before branching
>> > (see TODO at https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.7_Release)
>> > should be checked in today, or this weekend at the latest.
>> >
>> > Unless there are some other issues we haven't listed yet, I propose
>> > to create the branch on Monday morning.
>> >
>>
>> I have 4 patches I like to see in GDB 7.7:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00313.html
>
> This one is defenitely ok; thanks for revising it.
>
> The other three look reasonable, but I'm really not familliar enough
> with the instruction set to review these diffs. And I don't use that
> code myself. So you should probably just go ahead.
>
I checked 4 patches in. Thanks for reviewing them.
--
H.J.