This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] buildsym.c cleanup
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:58:50 -0600
- Subject: Re: [RFA] buildsym.c cleanup
- References: <yjt2fvxpwnu0 dot fsf at ruffy dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <87ehd95tl6 dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20130520090312 dot GM4017 at adacore dot com> <CADPb22SMF0-CL7Ryp3LjDseQRui_maCHL65uBZcM3O7eJwsd_A at mail dot gmail dot com>
>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
Doug> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>>> I have no idea about the COFF change. It isn't clear to me whether
>>> coffread and stabsread expect to share the same globals or not.
>>
>> I do not have a real idea either, but looking at the code, I do not
>> think so. The indices used to index the types seem completely
>> unrelated...
Doug> Hi. So what's the verdict here?
Doug> Should we wait until we can find someone to test this on coff, or
Doug> check the patch in now.
Joel said he thinks the globals aren't shared.
If you agree then I think it is fine to go ahead and put it in.
Tom