This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] dwarf2read.c: Don't assume uint32_t is unsigned int on all hosts.
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:11:11 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] dwarf2read.c: Don't assume uint32_t is unsigned int on all hosts.
- References: <20130521203421 dot 23721 dot 93618 dot stgit at brno dot lan> <CADPb22TzeQEanUGOMcFBJrStDYkk5zRUE2Fht_c_d5mQAYM7sw at mail dot gmail dot com> <519C932E dot 7000601 at redhat dot com> <CADPb22S0sYeTv+9_gsNO=3axHabLjgtwuyuNpyniLUfwwv9aCQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <519CEDF9 dot 7060000 at redhat dot com> <CADPb22Tw2b788uihCJjjnmKKGjgm525vmpThMzEHZ0fpSTqgzw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130523055353 dot GC4017 at adacore dot com> <519E0484 dot 9040103 at redhat dot com>
> If we ignore implementation details, can I take it you'd prefer
> the puint32 direction then?
My personal preference is to use plongest/pulongest. It's a little
bit like the puts vs fputs. We haven't put in place any mechanism
that prevents us from re-introducing puts, but the person who cares
enough about it can very easily fix them if/when they do re-appear.
--
Joel