This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Let dprintf can be saved
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:44:25 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dprintf can be saved
- References: <CANFwon0p7x4X1qx=kqu-XRJ0XYfv8NDW4WxqST=w16VDUZTSzw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87fvymwkbi dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CANFwon0Hu6zqh_Ro5T_=Fxm-A0HyqyRkOp8RC-3MEVMOJh2hOg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANFwon2zciiZg=Zes7D-XB5YBN3JhWCUtQay6eyx_SLdRZ45Jw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87txmysgfy dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hui> 2013-04-20 Hui Zhu <hui@codesourcery.com>
> Hui> PR gdb/15165
> Hui> * gdb.base/save-bp.exp: Add test for dprintf.
>
> This is ok.
>
> FWIW I think it is best to merge the bug fix with the test case and
> commit them as a single patch.
>
> Tom
OK. Checked in together.
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00221.html
Can I commit this patch to 7.6 branch?
Best,
Hui