This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFC on command names] Re: [rfc 6/8] record disas: omit function names by default
Hi Markus,
thanks for summarizing it. As everyone has his different naming opinion
choosing the IMO most clear naming by Eli (unless more opinions appear today).
> Eli:
> > record instruction-history
> > record source-lines-history
> > record function-call-history
Thanks,
Jan
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:34:02 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> Markus:
> > > record disassemble ......... instructions
> > > record list ....................... source lines
> > > record backtrace ............. functions
>
> Jan:
> > I still find "record list-functions" and "record list-instructions" more clear
> > than "record backtrace" and "record disassemble". Particularly as there is
> > the "list" word.
> >
> > Sorry for "bikeshedding" it, additionally so late, I do not want to keep this
> > discussion longer anymore.
>
> Eli:
> > > Maybe "record list-functions"?
> >
> > How about "record trace-functions"?
>
> Eli:
> > record instruction-history
> > record source-lines-history
> > record function-call-history
>
> Tom:
> > Jan> Maybe "record list-functions"?
> >
> > "record history" or "record function-history"?