This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFC on command names] Re: [rfc 6/8] record disas: omit function names by default


Hi Markus,

thanks for summarizing it.  As everyone has his different naming opinion
choosing the IMO most clear naming by Eli (unless more opinions appear today).

> Eli:
> >    record instruction-history
> >    record source-lines-history
> >    record function-call-history


Thanks,
Jan


On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:34:02 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> Markus:
> > >   record disassemble ......... instructions
> > >   record list ....................... source lines
> > >   record backtrace ............. functions
> 
> Jan:
> > I still find "record list-functions" and "record list-instructions" more clear
> > than "record backtrace" and "record disassemble".  Particularly as there is
> > the "list" word.
> > 
> > Sorry for "bikeshedding" it, additionally so late, I do not want to keep this
> > discussion longer anymore.
> 
> Eli:
> > > Maybe "record list-functions"?
> > 
> > How about "record trace-functions"?
> 
> Eli:
> >    record instruction-history
> >    record source-lines-history
> >    record function-call-history
> 
> Tom:
> > Jan> Maybe "record list-functions"?
> > 
> > "record history" or "record function-history"?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]