This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/25/2013 06:54 PM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:On 25/01/13 17:58, Pedro Alves wrote:
Okay. Seems odd to me to just be clear the low bits and doing nothing else if they're "reserved", instead of waiting until they do have some meaning (at which point GDB will necessarily need to learn to do something about them). Does actually end up seeing non-4 bytes instructions today somehow?
It would be safe to remove this masking code today, if you prefer.
I would. One place less for us to worry about if we want to change this interface before you define the bits.
(I'll be looking at the gdbserver/native patches next)
Ok, I'll re-spin without. /M
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |