This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: AndrÃ PÃnitz <andre dot poenitz at mathematik dot tu-chemnitz dot de>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:42:05 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
References: <874nkpv03j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121202093807.GA21883@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87y5hfvu5v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121203193713.GA10256@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87obibvsb1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121203202233.GA23933@klara.mpi.htwm.de> <20121203203126.GA13490@host2.jankratochvil.net>

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> body=[bkpt={number="1",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",what="<signal>",signal=["SIGINT","SIGTRAP"],times="0"}]

I see now that the "type" field for catchpoints is not very useful.

I think we should make that change depending on the particular type of
catchpoint that is installed.  Thoughts on this?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: André Pönitz
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]