This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
>> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.

Pedro> It's not pointless in gdbserver.  The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
Pedro> the WinCE port.  See fe7cf52e.

Thanks.
I think I will just drop this patch from the series.

Tom
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]