This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Re: [PATCH] Fix for incorect breakpoint set in case of clang compiled binary
- From: KARTHIKVENKATESH BHAT <kv dot bhat at samsung dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:57:58 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Fix for incorect breakpoint set in case of clang compiled binary
- Dlp-filter: Pass
- Msgkey: 20121120044317057@kv.bhat
- Reply-to: kv dot bhat at samsung dot com
Hi Tom
I had missed out to paste the changeLog in the mail. Please find the patch with changelog -
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.14836
diff -u -p -r1.14836 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 15 Nov 2012 16:12:11 -0000 1.14836
+++ ChangeLog 20 Nov 2012 04:39:46 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2012-11-20 Karthik Bhat <kv.bhat@samsung.com>
+
+ * i386-tdep.c (i386_skip_prologue): See if we
+ can determine the end of the prologue via the symbol table.
+ If so use the same instead of going through prologue instructions.
+
2012-11-15 Pierre Muller <muller@sourceware.org>
ARI fixes: move gdb_wait and gdb_stat headers to common subdirectory.
Index: i386-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.362
diff -u -p -r1.362 i386-tdep.c
--- i386-tdep.c 12 Nov 2012 21:59:06 -0000 1.362
+++ i386-tdep.c 20 Nov 2012 04:39:47 -0000
@@ -1582,8 +1582,30 @@ i386_skip_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdba
CORE_ADDR pc;
gdb_byte op;
int i;
+ cache.locals = -1;
+ CORE_ADDR func_addr;
+ struct symtab *s = find_pc_symtab (func_addr);
+
+ if (find_pc_partial_function (start_pc, NULL, &func_addr, NULL))
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR post_prologue_pc
+ = skip_prologue_using_sal (gdbarch, func_addr);
+
+ /* GCC always emits a line note before the prologue and another
+ one after, even if the two are at the same address or on the
+ same line. Take advantage of this so that we do not need to
+ know every instruction that might appear in the prologue. We
+ will have producer information for most binaries; if it is
+ missing (e.g. for -gstabs), assuming the GNU tools. */
+ if (post_prologue_pc
+ && (s == NULL
+ || s->producer == NULL
+ || strncmp (s->producer, "GNU ", sizeof ("GNU ") - 1) == 0
+ || strncmp (s->producer, "clang ", sizeof ("clang ") - 1) == 0))
+ return max (start_pc, post_prologue_pc);
+ }
+
Many of the current gcc test cases test this feature. We can reproduce this failure in clang with existing testcases such as break-always.exp,step-test.exp etc when tested with clang compiled binary.
Hence i'm using the existing test cases.
Tom> + Is there any other way?
Currently i could come up with this fix. Similar fix is used in case of ARM architecture.
Regards
Karthik
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com>
Date : Nov 20, 2012 00:49 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH] Fix for incorect breakpoint set in case of clang compiled binary
>>>>> "Karthik" == KARTHIKVENKATESH BHAT writes:
Karthik> I wanted to add a patch in i386-tdep.c . Similar to what is done in
Karthik> other architectures such as ARM,
Karthik> instead of actually going through the complete prologue if we can use
Karthik> the symbol table information to resolve prologue end.
I'm not the person to review this patch, but I did notice that it is
missing a ChangeLog entry and also a test case.
Karthik> + || strncmp (s->producer, "GNU ", sizeof ("GNU ") - 1) == 0
Karthik> + || strncmp (s->producer, "clang ", sizeof ("clang ") - 1) == 0))
Is there any other way?
Tom