This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output

From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess at broadcom dot com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:48:15 +0000
Subject: Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
References: <506DB4B8.5030001@broadcom.com> <5085B9D5.80508@broadcom.com> <50913B7F.10707@redhat.com> <5093A785.3060103@broadcom.com> <5093E786.2090909@redhat.com> <5098FEF0.60503@broadcom.com> <83d2zq39un.fsf@gnu.org> <509A7960.3010306@broadcom.com>

On 11/07/2012 03:08 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> That would probably be a good thing, but given I didn't add the code I'd
> rather not start changing these things.  Also, given that this exists in
> the wild and the MI interface is supposed to remain consistent I suspect
> we're stuck with what we have...

Yes.

> Just so I'm clear, should I consider this a block to committing this patch?

No.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Andrew Burgess
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Andrew Burgess
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output
  - From: Andrew Burgess

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]