This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: About RFA for Add scripts to generate ARI web pages to gdb/contrib/ari directory
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- To: "Pierre Muller" <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "'Pedro Alves'" <palves at redhat dot com>, "'Jan Kratochvil'" <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:35:18 -0300
- Subject: Re: About RFA for Add scripts to generate ARI web pages to gdb/contrib/ari directory
- References: <003c01cd3b3c$d85e07d0$891a1770$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <m37gvygteu.fsf@redhat.com> <002101cd3c42$5473b670$fd5b2350$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <m3txz1ffjw.fsf@redhat.com> <006701cd3d00$6b9566a0$42c033e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120529130144.GM5492@adacore.com> <4FC4CB35.5030503@redhat.com> <001501cd4a2a$2b84d5a0$828e80e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120614160200.GL18729@adacore.com> <000001cd4a48$b4a97e80$1dfc7b80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120614162234.GM18729@adacore.com> <000601cd7f87$792060d0$6b612270$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
On Tuesday, August 21 2012, Pierre Muller wrote:
> In order to avoid further digressions and as the thread is now already
> quite old,
> I was wondering if we should not first discuss of a general scheme
> as to how we should proceed here.
Sorry, I don't remember much of thread right now, but I glanced over the
archives and it seems that things were discussed quite a bit and your
patches were mostly OK.
> My plan was to:
> 1) create a contrib/ARI subdirectory
> in which I would copy the existing scripts.
src/gdb/contrib/ari, as Doung pointed out.
> 2) Remove useless code in new location and fix
> biggest errors in existing scripts only, leaving
> other improvements for later (so that they would appear
> in cvs history).
Great.
> 3) Add a minimal number of new scripts to allow easy use
> from within this new location.
Great.
> One of the issues was about where we should put the corresponding ChangeLog
> entries.
ISTR that the maintainers are not found of creating new ChangeLog files
on every new directory, so you should put the entries in gdb/ChangeLog
as usual, IIUC.
> I would like to restart the discussion
> from here.
> Pierre Muller
> as potential ARI maintainer...
Is there anything else? I really don't remember. If not, I guess you,
as the potential ARI maintainer, can take the next step and commit this
to the tree. But that's my opinion, of course.
Thanks,
--
Sergio