This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: About RFA for Add scripts to generate ARI web pages to gdb/contrib/ari directory
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Pierre Muller <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:24:56 -0700
- Subject: Re: About RFA for Add scripts to generate ARI web pages to gdb/contrib/ari directory
- References: <m37gvygteu.fsf@redhat.com> <m3txz1ffjw.fsf@redhat.com> <20120529130144.GM5492@adacore.com> <4FC4CB35.5030503@redhat.com> <20120614160200.GL18729@adacore.com> <20120614162234.GM18729@adacore.com> <50336283.a2db440a.600c.105dSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Pierre Muller
<pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> wrote:
>
> I made several proposals to include the ARI script in the main source of
> gdb, but I had the strong impression to get comments/suggestions for changes
> that went in opposite directions in several replies I got in the
> four versions I sent.
>
> Thus, I left for a nice holidays without having been able to
> commit anything.
>
> In order to avoid further digressions and as the thread is now already
> quite old,
> I was wondering if we should not first discuss of a general scheme
> as to how we should proceed here.
>
> My plan was to:
> 1) create a contrib/ARI subdirectory
> in which I would copy the existing scripts.
contrib/ari?
> 2) Remove useless code in new location and fix
> biggest errors in existing scripts only, leaving
> other improvements for later (so that they would appear
> in cvs history).
>
> 3) Add a minimal number of new scripts to allow easy use
> from within this new location.
Sounds great.
>
> One of the issues was about where we should put the corresponding ChangeLog
> entries.
gdb/ChangeLog is fine, I think.
> I would like to restart the discussion
> from here.