Re: [PATCH 1/3] define and check itset

[Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>]

On 05/31/2012 09:34 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> What good does it do to put this in ahead of its prerequisites?
> Can we please stop trying to put the cart before the horse?
> I'm trying to help with the async stuff, but the constant push
> in trying to put other bits in first frustrates me.  :-/
> 

I don't want to frustrates anyone here.  This bit doesn't have any
prerequisites, as I said, it is quite isolated from other parts.  I
don't see anything wrong this bits go in first.  The review process to
patch series 'run all-stop on top of non-stop' is not smooth, which
forces me to start to push this part first.

> The itsets bits need to be last.  I'm not even sure the syntax is
> what we want to end up with at all.  Last I touched them, I had
> wanted to spend a while trying to unify the concept of "current
> thread" with the itset.  There's a disconnect that gets in the
> way a bit.

I don't know your plan, and you are free to change whatever you'd like
to.  AFAICS, the syntax looks fine to me, so I posted them.

-- 
Yao (éå)