This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ping: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:33:06 +0530
Subject: Re: ping: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST
References: <20120220132724.GB4753@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120221210235.GA26897@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120504183858.67d416b7@spoyarek> <20120515151612.5b5fac87@spoyarek> <20120515094854.GA7020@host2.jankratochvil.net>

On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:48:54 +0200, Jan wrote:

> On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:46:12 +0200, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > Ping?
> 
> I am already working on it, it is very long.  BTW it needs one chunk
> rebase to HEAD and there is also one small pulongest issue - build
> failure - on 32-bit hosts.  But otherwise I do not have other results
> yet.
> 
> I expect you were checking it by splint again, I have not run it yet
> for this patch.
> 

Thanks, yes I did check this using splint, specifically the diff with
and without this patch.

--
Siddhesh

References:
- [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- ping: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: ping: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]