This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>, "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker at adacore dot com>, <yao at codesourcery dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:12:21 +0200
Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012
References: <20120420015817.GA7169@sourceware.org> <4F90C4F7.10302@codesourcery.com> <20120420043807.GI2852@adacore.com> <83d372ivjh.fsf@gnu.org> <43835.7730432928$1334919059@news.gmane.org>

"Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> writes:

> I have no opinion on the removal of this rule,
> I would just like to be sure that,
> if we allow to use inline function,
> the configure step will correctly define inline as nothing
> on systems using compilers that do not support inline functions.
>
>   Does anyone know if this is done inside GDB configuration step?

AC_C_INLINE in gdb/configure.ac.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012
  - From: GDB Administrator
- Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]