This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [no-commit-intention] Naive unnamed fields for main_type [Re: [patch] Fix gdb-gdb.py for flds_bnds copy-pastes]


On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:47 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm not sure that all these problems really represent C90
> incompatibilities.  Some of them are GNU extensions either discovered by
> configure (or did you reconfigure with those options?)

Yes, it was built from `git clean -dfx'.


> Jan> coff-x86_64.c:174:13: error: ISO C90 does not support ‘long long’ [-Werror=long-long]
> 
> Definitely a real bug :)

`long long' is apparently not supported by ISO C90 compilers, so it is a bug
if GDB claims C90 compatibility.  Or what do you mean?


> Jan> error: ISO C forbids forward references to ‘enum’ types [-Werror=edantic]
> 
> Do these really say 'edantic' (missing 'p')?
> If so, could you report it as a GCC bug?

Checked now it is popular GCC PR c/44774.


Thanks,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]