This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC stub-side break conditions 3/5] GDB-side changes
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>>> I suggest "cond.eval." instead of "condeval". Better yet, how about
>>> "evaluated by"?
>> Sounds good. I'll make that change.
Pedro> Isn't that only visible by MI? Are spaces valid in MI field names?
Yes, it is only visible to MI.
The MI spec does not rule out spaces AFAICT, but I would rather we stick
to names similar to those we already use. On this basis, "condeval" is
better than "cond.eval.".
Tom