This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regression for gdb.base/jit.exp and gdb.base/jit-so.exp [Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed]

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:53:32 +0100
Subject: Re: Regression for gdb.base/jit.exp and gdb.base/jit-so.exp [Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed]
References: <4EC8D2D4.1080402@playingwithpointers.com> <4EC9CE39.40604@earthlink.net> <20111126002251.GA5257@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4ED0E6F9.8090101@playingwithpointers.com>

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:17:45 +0100, Sanjoy Das wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response.  I've attached the fix.  With this
> patch GDB passes both jit.exp and jit-so.exp.

OK for check-in, but with FSF ChangeLog and with description of the ENTRY_ADDR
parameter in the functions' comments.

ENTRY_ADDR name itself associates me with an execution entry point - which it
is not.

Thanks,
Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/jit.exp and gdb.base/jit-so.exp [Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed]
  - From: Sanjoy Das

References:
- JIT Interface Patches Landed
  - From: Sanjoy Das
- Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Regression for gdb.base/jit.exp and gdb.base/jit-so.exp [Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/jit.exp and gdb.base/jit-so.exp [Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed]
  - From: Sanjoy Das

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]