This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal


On 11/15/11 8:30 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Tom" == Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com> writes:
Tom>  I plan to commit this sometime this week, barring objections or
Tom>  comments; after the doc patch (forthcoming) is approved.

I'm having second thoughts about this.  Today it seems slightly crazy to
check in such a huge patch just before a release.  Any other thoughts on
this?

Tom


One of the advantages of hacking on GDB vs GCC is that GDB degrades more gracefully; it's rare for a GDB patch to completely break debugging, while an innocent-looking GCC patch can bring the whole house of cards down. Plus, we
don't have any dependencies pushing us to release on a particular date, right? So I tend to think this would be OK for 7.4.


Stan
stan@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]