Re: [RFA] Preliminary work in fork_inferior

[Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>]

On Friday 16 September 2011 15:47:19, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> 
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> > Thanks, this is okay.
> > 
> > On Friday 16 September 2011 13:28:59, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >> +      /* If we get here, it's an error.  */
> >>       if (shell)
> >>        {
> >> -         execlp (shell_file, shell_file, "-c", shell_command, (char *) 0);
> >> -
> >> -         /* If we get here, it's an error.  */
> >>          fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr, "Cannot exec %s: %s.\n", shell_file,
> >>                              safe_strerror (errno));
> > 
> > I wouldn't mind merging the "Cannot exec" bits of both branches as well,
> > always printing the whole argv.
> 
> Ok, so more cleanup.  Something like that ?

Looks greak, thanks!  Please apply.

-- 
Pedro Alves