This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 22:14, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes: > > Tom> This test seems odd to me. ?Why does the lvalue-ness of the value > Tom> matter? > >>> I don't understand your means, could you do some explain? > > I just don't understand why a check of the VALUE_LVAL is necessary. > Does something go wrong in the other cases? ?It doesn't seem to me that > it should. > > Tom > Got it. I make a new patch remove the line: >> + if ((VALUE_LVAL (val_args[i]) == lval_internalvar >> + || VALUE_LVAL (val_args[i]) == not_lval) Please help me review it. Thanks, Hui 2011-09-06 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> * printcmd.c (ui_printf): Add a handler for TYPE_CODE_ARRAY.
Attachment:
fix-v-string.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |