This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
PR cli/13110
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:56:53 +0100
- Subject: PR cli/13110
<http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-09/msg00019.html>
Tested on x86_64-linux and applied.
Repeating what I said on gdb@, I'm now wondering if we actually ever
need the registers_changed call here or in wait_for_inferior
nowadays --- we flush threads' register caches when we resume
them (target_resume).
--
Pedro Alves
2011-09-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
PR cli/13110
gdb/
* infrun.c (fetch_inferior_event): Check if there's a selected
thread before checking if the selected thread is executing.
---
gdb/infrun.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: src/gdb/infrun.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/infrun.c 2011-09-05 15:50:49.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/infrun.c 2011-09-05 15:57:10.693964411 +0100
@@ -2749,7 +2749,9 @@ fetch_inferior_event (void *client_data)
switches threads anyway). If we didn't do this, a spurious
delayed event in all-stop mode would make the user lose the
selected frame. */
- if (non_stop || is_executing (inferior_ptid))
+ if (non_stop
+ || (!ptid_equal (inferior_ptid, null_ptid)
+ && is_executing (inferior_ptid)))
registers_changed ();
make_cleanup_restore_integer (&execution_direction);