This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:01:27 +0200, pfee@talk21.com wrote:
> I like the 'step' mode of scheduler-locking, but often wish it applied to the
> "next" command, not just step.
I agree, it does not apply to the continue-over-call part of `next'. But that
is a bug which should be fixed.
> My suggestion would be to create a "set scheduler-locking next" mode in which
> both "step" and "next" operate with other threads locked out.
Do you think the "step" mode would be still useful if "next" exists?
Thanks,
Jan
- References:
- [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet
- Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet
- Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet