This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: partially available registers

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:25:46 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers
References: <m3vcv6xegp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3sjq79soa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3y5zsyajz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Hi Tom,

On Wednesday 20 July 2011 21:14:08, Tom Tromey wrote:

> 2011-07-20  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf.c: XFAIL 'z' on x86-64.
> 	* gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf.exp (xfail-gdb-test): Add arch_pattern
> 	argument.
> 	* gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf-amd64.S: New file.

I get:

# of expected passes            39

with an unpatched gdb (x86-64-linux), same as with patched gdb.
Is that expected?

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: partially available registers
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- RFC: partially available registers
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: partially available registers
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: partially available registers
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]