This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: print_npx_status_word
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Baars, M.J." <mjbaars1977 dot gdb at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:29:10 -0400
- Subject: Re: print_npx_status_word
- References: <m3aafshl6l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA7ED79.3000400@gmail.com> <m3ei53efd8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA87235.7060003@gmail.com> <m3pqoncw78.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA87479.50203@gmail.com> <m3lizbcvt7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA93270.6030708@gmail.com> <201104160824.p3G8ONWV006175@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4DA99DA1.2090708@gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:46:09PM +0200, Baars, M.J. wrote:
> On 04/16/2011 10:24 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >>Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:08:48 +0200
> >>From: "Baars, M.J."<mjbaars1977.gdb@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>Hi Tom,
> >>
> >>I believe this is the format you requested?
> >No! This is a .tar.gz. Proper diffs don't come as a .tar.gz.
> Oops... did I remove one of your entries in the ChangeLog? :)
If you want a patch to be committed, eventually you're going to have
to say why. What's the goal of the patch?
Also, why on earth are you messing about with old changelog entries?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
Mentor Graphics