This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>, "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:37:04 +0000
- Subject: Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
- References: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E0C0E1A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC5730CFD3FC@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <m362u1rdm4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Thursday 06 January 2011 20:17:23, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Marc> There are other instances of error() being called without it
> Marc> from mi-main.c.
>
> These are all bugs.
>
I think that these instances are for example errors when a frontend
uses the wrong MI command syntax. Have we decided whether these
should be translated? Not sure who that helps.
If not, maybe we should have a mi_error function, so that the
ARI doesn't complain about them.
--
Pedro Alves