This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Regression for gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp [Re: [patch 1/2] Use custom hash function with bcache]


>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:

Doug> One would expect the original code to have done a memset too, instead
Doug> of using "static".  Presumably it didn't for performance reasons.  Do
Doug> we know if the performance concerns were real?

No, we don't know.
It is safest to just revert to what it was before.

The end of the previous thread is here
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-11/msg00104.html

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]