This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gdb.asm/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:51:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.asm/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
References: <4BFC240A.20902@vmware.com> <20100526174448.GB3019@adacore.com>

Joel Brobecker wrote:

2010-05-25 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>

* gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: Replace send_gdb with gdb_test.
This is OK.   But as Volodya pointed out, we need to make sure that
the ChangeLog is a little more accurate, since you also used
gdb_test_multiple.

Urgh, I also used gdb_test_no_output in some places.

Can I just change all the changelogs to say "gdb_test, etc."?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] gdb.asm/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- [RFA] gdb.asm/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] gdb.asm/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]