This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gdb/libiberty] Improve support for cross debugging shared libraries with DOS style pathnames (from Unix hosts)


> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:46:22 +0100
> 
> On Friday 23 April 2010 09:54:17, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> > 
> > >  (gdb) help set target-file-system-kind
> > >  Set assumed file system kind for target reported paths
> > 
> > Please don't use "path" when you really mean "file name".  It's
> > confusing; "path" should be reserved for lists of directories such as
> > PATH or INFOPATH.
> 
> Oh.  I really meant a "path", as in:
> 
>  "A path, the general form of a filename or of a directory name,
>  specifies a unique location in a file system."
> 
>  (From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29>.)
> 
> I suppose that's why we have IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH, and not IS_ABSOLUTE_FILE_NAME,
> and such.
> 
> IMO, it's the use of singular path or "search path" to mean
> "list of directories" that's overloaded.
> "Set assumed file system kind for target reported file names"
> kind of sounds like it is only talking about the filename "/dir1/dir2/files1"
> (or directory and filenames, if you think of a directory a file as well).
> Maybe I could just get rid of the mention of paths/file names, and go with:
> 
>   "Set the assumed file system kind of the target."
> 
> Anyway, I'll change it to what you think is clearer.

I think that depends on whether you're coming from a UNIX environment
or a DOS environment.  To me (not really having used DOS for two
decades) path is perfectly clear and acceptable.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]