This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFA] target record_core -> target record-core?
- From: Doug Evans <dje at sebabeach dot org>
- To: msnyder at vmware dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: [RFA] target record_core -> target record-core?
I realize this is a nit but is it possible to rename
target record_core to target record-core?
Or is it too late ...
All other targets (that I know of) use dashes in shortname, and having
to remember which use dashes and which use underscores is, umm, blechy.
[Unless we have and enforce a convention, it can only get worse,
so might as well establish one now - if it doesn't exist already.]
2010-04-18 Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
* record.c (init_record_core_ops): Rename record_core to record_core.
Index: record.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/record.c,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -p -r1.44 record.c
--- record.c 8 Mar 2010 13:34:38 -0000 1.44
+++ record.c 19 Apr 2010 06:44:51 -0000
@@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ record_core_has_execution (struct target
static void
init_record_core_ops (void)
{
- record_core_ops.to_shortname = "record_core";
+ record_core_ops.to_shortname = "record-core";
record_core_ops.to_longname = "Process record and replay target";
record_core_ops.to_doc =
"Log program while executing and replay execution from log.";