This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Improve heuristic to guess the instruction state for the next PC when single-stepping
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: matthew dot gretton-dann at arm dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:09:06 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Improve heuristic to guess the instruction state for the next PC when single-stepping
- References: <1267703327.13980.13.camel@e102111-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100304133944.GA21490@caradoc.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:39:47 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > (arm_get_next_pc): Modified to use arm_get_next_pc_raw ().
>
> At some point we were asked to not use " ()" to indicate functions
By RMS, no doubt. He maintains that `foo ()' looks like a call to
`foo' with no arguments, which is usually not what you want to
express.