This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] New testes for process record save/restore commands
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:23:40 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFA] New testes for process record save/restore commands
- References: <4ADCC1CE.1090304@vmware.com> <20091019200322.GD5282@adacore.com>
> > 2009-10-19 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> >
> > * gdb.reverse/break-precsave.exp: New test.
> > * gdb.reverse/consecutive-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/i386-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/machinestate-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/sigall-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/solilb-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/until-precsave.exp: Ditto.
> > * gdb.reverse/watch-precsave.exp: Ditto.
Oops, I also forgot to mention: Regarding the FIXMEs (FIXME: command
ought to acknowledge, so we can test if it succeeded), I think you can
verify that the command generated no output using gdb_test_multiple
(I think!).
--
Joel