This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:55:44 -0600
Subject: Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value
References: <m363c1j8sd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3eiqm8hm5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <200909050001.11926.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> On Friday 04 September 2009 23:33:54, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> I added an 'arch' field to piece_closure because we need the objfile's
>> architecture when decoding a stack value; I think we can't use the
>> frame's architecture because we might not have a frame.

Pedro> That sounds strange to me.  When would we be reading things
Pedro> off the stack and not have a frame?

Sorry, I wasn't clear.  I was referring to the dwarf expression stack.
The value in question comes from DW_OP_stack_value.

Tom

References:
- RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]