This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/RFC Prec] Add process record skip 6/6 (doc)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, msnyder at vmware dot com, green at moxielogic dot com
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:10:09 +0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC Prec] Add process record skip 6/6 (doc)
- References: <daef60380908190112i70ac8e42hda2689773dfd47f8@mail.gmail.com> <837hwzir3w.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908222033y4af21f93n7b7f41fe066ca54d@mail.gmail.com> <8363cefkkp.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908240149n6ed65a95u6bd75750eee21854@mail.gmail.com> <83fxbhdofo.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908242047i727e42b7w153c2ed58a060cf8@mail.gmail.com> <83skfecvmz.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908310626q41dfee5al987dbeac3d60ee03@mail.gmail.com> <83hbvo9blv.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380909010156y379e470pf9781f18aa198427@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:56:42 +0800
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com, green@moxielogic.com
>
> I think this idea is not bad. But when user set a simple_function to
> GDB, check if this function is really a simple function or not is not
> easy.
Why should GDB care? Let the user care.
> What about keep this idea and add special patch for it when gdb
> support record skip?
<Shrug> If no one else is concerned about this, I can live with that.
> +beginning of a function. When this breaks break, if
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"When this breakpoint breaks"
Otherwise, fine.