This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix

From: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:29:27 +0200
Subject: RE: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
References: <000501c9f12b$68c860e0$3a5922a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200906210227.48175.pedro@codesourcery.com> <E1MINPA-0002yq-8h@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301c9f28f$aa284220$fe78c660$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MIWHQ-00010J-Ns@fencepost.gnu.org>

> So, on balance, I'd suggest to fix the testsuite not to expect this
> Posix semantics, at least not on DOS/Windows.

Hi Eli,

  does that mean that I should make the change specific to Dos/Windows
targets? 
  I am not sure to know how to do that cleanly...

  Or should I just commit my patch as is,
the purpose of the test is completely different anyhow.


Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- RE: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]