This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Per-type architecture (Re: [10/15] Basic value access routines)


On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some people think that a basic UNIX-like system should include the
> tools to build and debug computer programs, at least those written in
> C.  So on OpenBSD (and most of the other BSD's) we ship gcc, binutils
> and gdb as part of the base operating system.  This means that if
> these tools depend on certain libraries, we have to include those
> libraries as well.  There are a couple of issues here:

Note that - because of this concern precisely - the XML library
dependency is optional.  It would have saved a lot of hassle if it
weren't, but that's a choice we've already made and I think it was
the right choice.

Once the user says they do want to build in XML support, I don't think
that which XML library they need to go build is particularly
important.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]