This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: paawan oza <paawan1982 at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:49:57 +0800
- Subject: Re: submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
- References: <111561.25938.qm@web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Email body = text part of Email.
Send test format of everything.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 02:51, paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hui,
>
> I am not sure whether I followed you correctly.
> please try to clear the comments in lined below.
>
>> Hi Oza,
>>
>> Thanks for your works.? Before I read your patch, I
>> have some ideas
>> with your RFA:
>>
>> 1. Please don't post compress package.? I did it in
>> before.? But it's
>> not friendly for review.
>
> Oza : Are you suggesting that, I should send the ChangeLog and README and patch separately without compressing it ?
>
>
>> 2. Post the readme and changelog to the Email body.
>> If you like, post
>> the patch to the email body too.? A lof of people like
>> it.
>
> Oza : email body is "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
> correct ?
>
>> 3.? Maybe you can post some test example to test the
>> patch.
>
> Oza : I will post a test example, which could do initial verification for the patch.
>
>> I suggest you re-send a rfa that post most thing to email
>> body.? And
>> if you want, you can post the url to
>> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ReversibleDebugging
>> "Support i386 more
>> better".
>
> Oza : what is RFA? after posting are you suggesting, that I should change
> the wiki contents ? and post it to "email-body" ?
>
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>
>
>
>