This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr, brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:00:13 +0300
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup
References: <200904151523.n3FFNIY9025877@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200904151532.n3FFWprh023949@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:32:52 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: eliz@gnu.org, muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, brobecker@adacore.com,
>         gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> Can we please stop this pointless discussion about a silly political
> argument and get back to actually make GDB a better tool?

It's not silly, at least not to me.

To avoid such arguments in the future, I think we need to agree once
and for all on some rules and codify them.

References:
- Re: [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]