This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-independent part
- From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior <sergiodj at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:20:39 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-independent part
- References: <1232929831.26873.22.camel@miki> <200901260053.06295.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1232945747.26873.27.camel@miki> <1232989355.26873.39.camel@miki> <20090201193306.GJ4597@caradoc.them.org> <1235561189.14363.20.camel@miki> <20090227221133.GA12904@caradoc.them.org> <1238352626.23609.14.camel@miki> <20090331154452.GA13260@caradoc.them.org> <1239305373.6452.13.camel@miki> <20090409193556.GA27633@caradoc.them.org>
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:29:33PM -0300, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> > So this is my opinion about this: I have the complete catch syscall
> > patch here (the only thing that's missing is the MI support), so what do
> > you think if we just push this patch upstream as-is (which is: in a
> > pretty good shape, as far as I understood the others developers' --
> > including yours -- comments), and postpone this MI support? I think I
> > should be able to sit down and implement this support until the end of
> > this semester, is it good for you?
>
> Yes, that's fine. If someone else needs it, they'll fill it in.
Thank you very much, Daniel. I'll prepare the patch for resubmission as
soon as I get some free time here :-).
Regards,
--
Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil