This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?

From: teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>
To: "Andreas Schwab" <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: "Pedro Alves" <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, "Michael Snyder" <msnyder at vmware dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:27:45 +0800
Subject: Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
References: <200810180210.16346.pedro@codesourcery.com> <48F93A22.7070409@vmware.com> <200810180408.42297.pedro@codesourcery.com> <je1vyethw5.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

I try "asm ("nop 0");" in with x86-32 gcc got insn:
 8048352:       0f 1f 05 00 00 00 00    nopl   0x0

On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 16:41, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I think asm ("nop") like below is your best bet.  Is there any assembler
>> that doesn't understand "nop"?
>
> ia64 wants "nop 0".
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>

References:
- [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]