This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap))


On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:06:44PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>  > I wrote that overlay code over 10 years ago.
>  > I wonder whether anyone still uses it?
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>  > I generally considered the overlays to be no longer supported and just still
>  > not removed from the code.  While reading other GDB code I was feeling overlays
>  > are no longer supported on multiple places but sure I may be wrong.
>  >
>  > Could you please name which current arch is dependent on overlaying?
>
>  As you may be able to guess from context, the answer is SPU :-)

Ah hah! :-)

>  Each SPE has only a 256K local store which it uses for code, stack,
>  and heap.  That's not very much space, so overlays are frequently
>  required.

Yep.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]