This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Use the ARM CPSR as a fallback to determine ARM/Thumb
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 18:45:57 +0300
- Subject: Re: RFC: Use the ARM CPSR as a fallback to determine ARM/Thumb
- References: <20060220214918.GA28798@nevyn.them.org> <1140519913.27380.29.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20060221153601.GA21183@nevyn.them.org> <20060302221446.GA18830@nevyn.them.org> <20080501183805.GA22218@caradoc.them.org> <uabj9xb6l.fsf@gnu.org> <20080502140254.GE29202@caradoc.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:02:54 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> Is this better?
Yes, except that I think "CPSR" should be in @code.
> > > + These variables control how ARM GDB determines whether instructions
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> > "commands", not "variables", I think.
>
> I agree, changed. (There's a "variable" reference to a set command a
> few lines above, though).
Nobody is perfect...