This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Markus Deuling <deuling at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, drow at false dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:29:48 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
References: <20080421193652.GA23498@caradoc.them.org> <200804212000.m3LK0gFL008220@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080421202318.GB26164@caradoc.them.org> <480D747C.6040609@de.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:15:40 +0200
> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
> CC: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> I added some lines to the documentation.
> Is this ok ?

Yes, thanks.

> +types.  Also suitable for unions.  As unions aren't part of regular fortran
> +this can only happen when accessing a register that uses a gdbarch-defined
> +union type.

"Fortran" capitalized, please, and please give me a comma between
"Fortran" and "this" in the above sentence.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
  - From: Markus Deuling

References:
- Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran
  - From: Markus Deuling

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]