This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It looks like we've fallen afoul of the code which fetches the > first register set, then if it is not available does not try any > further register sets. So when we try PTRACE_GETVRREGS and fail > we never try PTRACE_GETEVRREGS. > > This code's bitten me before. It's even worse now, because if which > ptrace operations succeed depends on the inferior's mode, the values > may change during multi. So I've pulled it out. The attached patch, > combined with yours, produces no regressions on any of (SPE, AltiVec, > classic PowerPC). Ah, good catch. Thank you very much for testing my patch (and fixing the problems!). > Want to check them both in? Sure, I've now checked them in. Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |