This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:22:36 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
References: <18417.38670.195071.81191@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <m3y77x1mxb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080410142029.GB21662@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

Daniel> Seems like this will be just as awkward in the long term, but
Daniel> it's an improvement.

Is there some other approach you'd prefer?

Daniel> OK if it tested fine.

I didn't run the test suite without the patch; I'll do that next week
& check it in if it looks ok.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]