This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: (gdb-6.8) Discard breakpoint address if shared library is unloaded


Joel Brobecker writes:
 > Nick,
 > 
 > > 2008-02-15  Nick Roberts  <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
 > > 
 > > 	* breakpoint.c (print_one_breakpoint_location): Revert Enb field
 > > 	to old format.  Discard breakpoint address if shared library is
 > > 	unloaded.
 > > 	(breakpoint_1): Adjust formatting of table header accordingly.
 > 
 > The patch looks fine, but I assumed that you had run the testsuite
 > before sending it. From my end, it looks like you didn't, and I find
 > this quite disappointing. Based on Volodya's email, I ran the testsuite
 > myself (which I really shouldn't have to), and discovered that your
 > patch causes ~20 new failures, not just the 3 that Volodya discovered.
 > 
 > Your patch cannot go in until the failures are investigated and fixed.
 > 
 > Please make sure to always confirm in your submissions that you did
 > run the testsuite, mentioning which architecture it was run on, and
 > also confirm that it did not introduce any regression.

I did run the whole testsuite on the first patch that I submitted which, as you
pointed out, was missing some detail which I had somehow lost since last
November, but not the amendment to that patch.  You might find it disappointing
that I've not rerun the testsuite but I find it disappointing that I have had
to submit complete patches for code, doumentation and testsuite to revert
changes which I pointed out broke things for Emacs.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]