This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
References: <200712142009.08263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712142207.19754.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712141920.lBEJKVI1027649@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200712142240.20597.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:40:20PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Here's the revised patch. OK?

linux-nat.c, linux-thread-db.c, and win32-nat.c all print only under
control of a verbose flag.  While we're unifying the code we should
unify the behavior too - should this always be shown, or not?

The call site in linux-nat.c never received the verbose flag, so it
has not been printing for a while.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]