This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming.
- From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:08:00 +0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming.
- References: <200711231623.04823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <m3ve7ej5xb.fsf@codesourcery.com>
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 04:17:52 Jim Blandy wrote:
> - We should rename trap_expected to stepped_over_breakpoint. The past
> tense 'stepped' suggests that we're talking about a step which has
> already happened (which is true by the time we reach
> handle_inferior_event).
Just like Dan, I find 'stepped' confusing -- we set it before we
actually stepped. I think 'stepping' is fine -- it's set before
we're about to step, and is set until we're done with stepping.
Otherwise, your proposal looks good to me!
- Volodya