This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
- From: "Charles Wilson" <libtool at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm>
- To: "Steve Ellcey" <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
- Cc: dave dot korn at artimi dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, newlib at sourceware dot org, "Ralf Wildenhues" <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, aoliva at redhat dot com, bonzini at gnu dot org, fxcoudert at gmail dot com, schwab at suse dot de
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:02:53 -0400
- Subject: Re: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
- References: <200704121513.IAA09781@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:13:00 -0700 (PDT), "Steve Ellcey"
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > But there's still a problem (and this may affect other platforms;
> > *should* do so, I think -- so I'm confused by Steve's success here;
> > Steve: are you building the src/ stuff separately from the gcc stuff, or
> > are you using a combined tree like I am? I think the issue I am seeing
> > will affect all platforms, but only if doing a combined build AND when
> > --disable-shared is NOT explicitly passed during configure).
>
> Yes, I build src seperately from gcc. I.e. not a combined tree.
Thanks for the clarification. I guess my use of a combined tree exposed
a weakness in your libtool patch, but hopefully Paolo's contribution (
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00663.html ) will plug that
hole, and we can move closer to getting your stuff in-tree.
--
Chuck